About the Journal

 

Bulletin of Advanced Accounting Systems and Public Accountability (BOAASAPA) is a peer-reviewed, open-access international journal dedicated to publishing pioneering research at the dynamic intersection of advanced accounting technologies, financial information systems, and public sector governance. Positioned as a premier scholarly forum for financial technology and institutional transparency, the bulletin serves accounting scholars, information systems researchers, public finance economists, government auditors, and policy analysts worldwide. BOAASAPA prioritizes high-impact empirical research, system architecture evaluations, econometric analyses, and case studies on digital fiscal transparency. By synthesizing core accounting principles with cutting-edge technological frameworks (such as AI, blockchain, and big data) and public sector dynamics, the bulletin fosters a deep, comprehensive understanding of how modernized accounting systems drive institutional accountability, prevent financial fraud, and ensure the efficient allocation of public resources.

Reflecting its mandate to champion technological innovation and accountability in the public sphere, the bulletin welcomes high-quality original research articles, systematic literature reviews, econometric studies, and applied system evaluations within the following thematic areas:

Advanced Accounting Information Systems (AIS): Cloud-based accounting, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) in the public sector, big data analytics in financial reporting, and the integration of emerging financial technologies.

Public Sector Accountability & Transparency: Open government data initiatives, financial disclosure quality, institutional governance frameworks, and anti-corruption mechanisms in public administration.

Digital Auditing & Forensic Accounting: Artificial intelligence in continuous auditing, blockchain applications for public funds tracking, fraud detection algorithms, and digital forensics in state-owned enterprises (SOEs).

Public Financial Management (PFM) & E-Government: E-budgeting, digital taxation and revenue administration, fiscal decentralization, and the technological optimization of public expenditure tracking.

Ethics, Social, and Performance Accounting: Value-for-money (VfM) audits, ethical implications of automated financial decision-making, performance-based budgeting, and ESG reporting in government entities.

Publication Frequency

To ensure rigorous editorial oversight while facilitating the timely dissemination of highly relevant financial and technological research, BOAASAPA is published semi-annually (2 issues per year, typically scheduled for release in June and December). Special thematic issues focusing on artificial intelligence in public auditing, the implementation of blockchain in government financial tracking, or post-crisis fiscal accountability may be commissioned by the Editorial Board.

BOAASAPA enforces a strict double-blind peer review policy to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity, analytical objectivity, and empirical validity across accounting and information systems disciplines.

Initial Desk Evaluation: Every submission undergoes a preliminary screening by the Editor-in-Chief or a relevant Subject Editor to assess thematic alignment, methodological soundness (econometric rigor, system evaluation validity, data accuracy, or conceptual logic), and structural compliance. Plagiarism screening via Turnitin/iThenticate is strictly executed at this stage, requiring a similarity index below the bulletin's maximum threshold.

Expert Peer Review: Manuscripts passing the desk evaluation are anonymized and assigned to at least two independent international reviewers who are established academic researchers, senior government auditors, or financial technology experts.

Editorial Decision: Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the Editorial Board renders one of four decisions: Acceptance, Revisions Required (Minor/Major), Resubmit for Review, or Rejection. The final decision rests entirely on intellectual merit, methodological clarity, and the potential for tangible impact on public sector accounting practices.